Home / Top / World War II Myths We Still Believe

World War II Myths We Still Believe

The Second World was one of the most far-reaching events in human history. It fundamentally changed the world like most other big things could not and its effects can be felt in many places. It's also arguably the most talked-about was, as we've discussed it all WW2 trivia at this point.

Despite this, there are still a lot of misconceptions about the war, as it has become a source of propaganda and unreliable word of mouth. Even if it has been more than seven decades since WW2, what has been said to be the most-repeated myths refuse to die out.

Total Death Count Of Holocaust Was 6 Million

The Holocaust was the most horrifying part of the Second World War, which was saying it was a lot of horrifying parts. The systematic killing of six million Jews across Nazi-held territory shocked the rest of the world when the war was over, as the extent of the violence was – then then – hidden in the fog of war.

What we often forget in that six million death count, however, is that the Jews were not the only targets of Hitler's Final Solution. The concentration camps were a rather inclusive establishment Nazis did not like. Holocaust casualties were far higher if you include other prisoners of the camps, like opposing political factions, Soviet POWs, Roma gypsies, Poles, homosexuals and Serbs. According to some estimates, the Roma lost 70 to 80 percent of its European population in the Holocaust. While they do not have the exact numbers on the total count, the historians put the total death count of the Holocaust to somewhere in the range of 15 to 20 million.

Americans Led D-Day

The Normandy Landings – so known as D-Day – would always be remembered as 'that time we started beating the Nazis back'. By far the most massive seaborne invasion in history, it had a lot of riding on it. It was a massive operation aimed at the Nazis, and was widely regarded as the turning point of the war. Other than the Allied Fighting in the Eastern Theater –

Despite being a combined effort, though, it's still referred to as a primarily-American effort, even in other countries. In reality, even if it makes a contribution to the invasion, America did not lead the Normandy landings at all. British warships outnumbered American ones by 4: 1. 31% of the supplies for the invasion came from Britain, as well as two-thirds of the 12,000 allied aircrafts deployed. If it were not for Britain's military bases in the region, the invasion would probably have never happened.

Dropping the Atomic Bomb What the Worst Bombing Of The War

A lot has been said about the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of the war , A lot has been left out, too, as it's still one of the more controversial parts of the whole. While many believed that the bombs were needed to make the bombing, the bombs were sort of overkill.

While there's no doubt that the atomic bombings killed a lot of people, especially civilians, they often overshadow another bombing raid in Japan that was bad – if not worse than the atom bombs. Often called the most destructive bombing raid in history, the fire-bombing of Tokyo which is especially targeted at civilians. It was made worse by the recent invention of napalm; more than 500,000 cylinders of petroleum jelly were dumped in a single night, with over a million maimed.

and a million more made homeless. In Japan, the bombings are remembered in the same way as the atom bombs, as it may be the biggest fire bombing raid in history.

The Atomic Bombs, deadly The Atomic Bombs, The Atomic Bombs 19659025] Hiroshima and Nagasaki have dropped their attention to Hiroshima and Nagasaki – especially in the American education curriculum. It is true that the surrendered Japan was surrendered due to the invasion of the country.

While this may well be true, the idea that Japan surrendered due to the atomic bombs is faulty intelligence at worst, and intentional propaganda at worst. Japan had previously been quoted as surrogate before the bombs, as a conditional prisoner. Of course, they were not exactly acceptable at the time, though they did not know about Japan's intention to surrender.

Most importantly, though, the primary reason behind Japan's surrender was the [19659006] Soviet invasion of Japanese colonies in the time between the two bombs.

D-Day Ended The War

The Normandy Landings are often referred to as the turning point of the. A massive military operation by all accounts, it facilitates the recapture of the occupied French territory and eventually the rest of occupied Europe. In western countries, it's still the single most pivotal point in the war against the Nazis.

Now we're not making the sacrifices during the invasion succeed to win the war – though D-Day was hardly the turning point. That was actually some time in 1941, when Hitler decided to invoke the one country it probably left alone: ​​Soviet Russia. The only reason the rest of the allies even had the strength to regroup and launch a counter attack on Normandy is that the Nazis were too busy fighting the Soviets in the biggest theater of war in history. By 1944 – when D-Day happened – Germany was well on its way to defeat . Sure, if the D-Day had not happened, it would have been under Soviet control after the war.

The Polish Horse Cavalry Batch Never Happened [19659036] One of the most often-repeated stories from the war was that of Polish lancers on horseback charging at German Panzers. It's cited as the last use of horse cavalry in military history, as well as the general proof of the superiority of Polish cavalry. In reality, though, the Polish cavalry charge never really happened, even if they did were known to be one of the best cavalry forces in the world at one point. It was propagated by the Nazis in an attempt to portray the Poles as bad fighters, which was far from being the case. The Polish resistance plays a huge role in the emancipation of many Nazi-held areas across Europe. crucial – probably decisive role in the allied forces that beat the Nazis, despite their contribution remains largely forgotten.

The Japanese Were Good At Jungle Warfare

not sure about the origins of this one, though we are assuming it's due to be confused with the Japanese with other Asian armies, or simply widespread misconceptions about Japan's topography. Many allied soldiers were believed to be young people.

The Japanese were no better at jungle warfare than any country in the world, for the simple reason that Japan does not exist have as many jungles as we think. There were many points in the war when the Japanese struggled against jungle-based fighters in Asia themselves, as they had little to no training in the jungle. They were, admittedly, good at fighting in the night, which may have given them an unintended advantage in jungle terrain, giving way to the myth.

It Started In 1939

WW2, chances are it's not something you'd struggle with. It was started with the Nazi invasion and eventual occupation of Poland in 1939, which is how it's taught in schools around the world. 1939 is a rather Eurocentric view of things. In 1939, when Japan invaded Manchuria [19659006]or 1937, when Italy invaded Ethiopia. Most non-European / American historians, however, agree that it was not 1937, when the Japanese invaded the Chinese mainland in one of the most brutal invasions in history.

It Was A Clear Good Vs Bad War

One of the most enduring myths about the Second World War is what it fought between good guys and bad guys. Axis forces fighting on the side of good.

While the Nazis were still outright bad guys – so we got that part right – the Allies also committed many horrifying acts throughout the world was that muddies that was 'good vs bad' reputation. The Soviet invasion of Germany was one of the most devastating invasions in history, with mass rapes and executions of civilians in broad daylight (the situation was similar, albeit less extreme, in Western Germany). We've already mentioned the fire raids of Tokyo, though napalm was indiscriminately used in many other air campaigns on Axis territory, like Dresden. An overwhelming majority of people have been targeted at civilian areas, meant to be retaliated against the populations than any real military goal, as those countries were already well on their way to defeat. The British air-bombing campaigns killed hundreds of thousands of civilians while recapturing Germany, along with other repressive campaigns in many of their colonies against rebelling populations.

A lot of that could be explained by a lack of international laws and modern concepts WW2 was definitely not the black and white Other translations of 'ethical war behavior at the time' Articles you Might Like

Liked it? Take a second to support Toptenz.net on Patreon!

Source link