History shows us that human rights violations occur all too often in times of extraordinary crises. The coronavirus pandemic is no different. The UK government provided police officers with a powerful new toolkit to arrest those accused of violating the quarantine rules. The rash legislation, including the Coronavirus Act 2020, allowed the police to use "reasonable violence" to induce the public to comply with the orders to block. And updates to health protection regulations meant that citizens could no longer leave their own homes without an “appropriate excuse”. The police accepted these new forces with remarkable zeal.
Top 10 coronavirus messages with deaf and dumb celebrities who are Cringey AF.
Many forces began to examine the little things of everyday life and took unprecedented interest in public shopping habits and exercised routines, social behavior and travel. Citizens were punished for spending too long outdoors. Police cars patrolled park benches and shopping streets. The “non-essential” activities of hikers and sunbathers were recorded on police Twitter accounts and shamed the non-compliant.
However, it soon became clear that many police officers were abusing their new powers. In May, it was found that every single charge under the Coronavirus Act was wrong. The media reported cases where police officers arrested people for sitting on park benches. And the British Home Secretary had to remind officials that they should go to the police with consent. With that in mind, let's take a look at just ten cases where the British Corona policemen have gone too far.
0 Clinging to Easter Eggs
At the height of the UK Coronavirus emergency, the government ordered the closing of cafes, restaurants, outdoor markets, and other “non-essential” shops. While convenience stores remained open to the public, some officials began to enforce trade rules that didn't even exist.
The police from Gloucestershire quickly descended into Gloucester Retail Park. The group used a CCTV vehicle to watch local shopping habits. The officials then warned customers not to buy essential items. "Essential trip? Some items on our list … color, top floor, a navigation device, an Easter egg, a scratch card, bamboo fences, rockfalls, ”tweeted the Gloucester police. "Ask yourself if it's really necessary. Help save lives and stay at home." 
Meanwhile, Northamptonshire chief of police, Nick Adderley, warned that not compliant citizens could be subject to stricter restrictions. "We're not going to put roadblocks in place at this time. We're not going to start marshaling supermarkets and checking items in baskets and carts at this time to see if it's a legitimate, necessary article, "said Adderley." But don't be under any illusions, if people don't heed the warnings and requests I make today, we'll start with that. " 
The Cambridge Police Department went even further, sending officers to check the "non-essential aisles" of grocery stores. "Good to see that everyone adhered to social detachment measures d the non-essential corridors were empty, "the troop tweeted. The police withdrew and a spokesman argued that the social media post was written by an "overblown" official.
The Association of Convenience Stores (ACS) said it had received several reports from officials who had instructed the stores not to sell hot-cross buns to Easter eggs. The head of the ACS, along with the UK Home Secretary, told the police that there were no new restrictions on the sale of major retailers.
9 Imposing fines on chalks
A London bakery recently introduced security measures to protect customers from the corona virus. On March 27, the owners of the Grodzinski bakery in Edgware sprayed socially distant markings on the sidewalk. It was hoped that this would keep customers at least two meters apart when they were in front of the bakery. But the measures caught the eye of a Metropolitan Police sergeant with eagle eyes. The policeman argued that the socially distant lines were a form of graffiti before he issued a ticket for criminal harm. The bakery manager protested the official and explained that the markings were made of temporary, sprayed chalk.
A confused spectator asks the officer if he feels comfortable when he issues the ticket. "Yes sir, because the law is the law," replied the sergeant. "It doesn't change just because of what happens. Otherwise there would be anarchy in the world." The policeman instructs the bakery owner to remove the markings. The Metropolitan Police eventually reversed the course after the footage of the incident went viral The ticket was finally scrapped. 
8 After citizens with drones
The use of surveillance technologies is becoming increasingly common in modern Britain. Police officers are now equipped with sophisticated air drones that can collect live video feeds and thermal images. During the recent outbreak of the corona virus, the police used these drones along with roadblocks to ensure that citizens abide by social distance rules and avoid unnecessary travel.
Coronavirus Law 2020 gave the police new powers to force residents to return to their homes. In the meantime, the civil aviation authority relaxed drone safety regulations and gave officials more effective jurisdiction over beaches, parks, and residential areas. 
The nature of this legislation was sharply launched by the Derbyshire police to launch drones to spy on unsuspecting hikers. The drones followed the citizens on their hikes in the Peak District, a remote park in rural England. The police also used the devices to get the license plates of vehicles in a nearby parking lot. "Some license plates came back to the keepers in #Sheffield, so we know people travel to visit these areas,"  tweeted the boys in blue. The police posted pictures of the hikers on Twitter and edited the video with motion graphics and captions. “Go to the Peak District with your dog. Not absolutely necessary, ”said a caption. “Up to the peaks to watch the sunset. Not absolutely necessary, ”said another.
7 Turning over a grill
On March 24, the neighbors of an apartment complex in Coventry, England, were busy preparing an outdoor grill. But the local bobbies smelled of the group's delicious cuisine and came into force. When the West Midlands police officers discovered a group of about 20 people, they directed the group to disperse.
The group claimed that it was their right to continue grilling. "My children have to eat," pleaded a woman. When it became clear that the residents would not back away, the officers went to the grill and turned him over. Most of the cops took a picture of their handiwork. The image showing food and charcoal scattered across the floor was uploaded to the West Midlands Police website. "Our officers were forced to tip the grill over when the defiant group initially refused to leave,"  read the caption.
Only the police action was not completely ordered. The Health Protection Ordinance 2020 only came into force a few days later, which meant that officials were not authorized to push residents back into their homes. Grilling was completely legal.
6 48 hours in prison for “loitering around”
Marie Dinou was the first person convicted under the Coronavirus Act 2020. On March 28, the British Traffic Police (BTP) Dinou discovered "loitering between platforms" at Newcastle Central Station. She was also accused of traveling without a valid ticket. This prompted the BTP to call the regular police. The officers arrested the 41-year-old for violating Coronavirus 2020 and refusing to disclose her "identity or reasons for the trip." 
Dinou was immediately taken to a cell, where she remained in police custody for 48 hours. Dinou appeared at the North Tyneside Magistrates & # 39; Court. However, the district judge sent the corona criminals back to the cells after she refused to identify herself. The judge found the woman guilty of violating the barring rules and fined her £ 660 ($ 800). The procedure, which was carried out in a single hearing, took place in the absence of Dinou.
The police and judiciary, however, remained red when it turned out that they had initiated completely illegal prosecution. Kirsty Brimelow, chairman of the Human Rights Committee, said on the subject: “It's a mess. She was prosecuted under the Coronavirus Act Sch 21. It has committed no crime under this act. “ It turned out that offenses committed under Schedule 21 only apply to people who are considered“ potentially infected ”. And the police are only allowed to hold a potentially infected person for testing or self-isolation. To make matters worse, the law does not give the police the authority to require a person's identity or reasons for the trip.
Top 10 Unsolved Secrets of the COVID-19 Pandemic
5 Homeless Man Charged for Lockdown Break
In late April, a Metropolitan Police officer confronted a homeless person at Liverpool Street Station in London. The man, Sultan Monsour, told the official that he lived in Stratford before admitting to actually being homeless. But the policeman's patience eventually "ran out". When the officer saw the rough sleeper a second time 10 days later, he accused him of violating the lock. The fee sheet said: "[W] Without a reasonable excuse, contrary to what is permitted in the regulations, [you] was outside the place where you lived, namely without a fixed address or refused to provide your address details." 
On May 4, District Judge Alexander Jacobs expressed confusion during a hearing before the Westminster Magistrates' Court. "If he is homeless, the accusation that he left the place where he lived, namely no fixed address, makes no sense to me," argued Judge Jacobs. The judge also seemed puzzled by the arrest official's comments that the defendant was arrested for "violating the coronavirus terms because he had no address". Prosecutors continue to insist that the case set for June 22, 2020 continue.
Such incidents are not uncommon in the British capital. Journalist Brendan O’Neill witnessed numerous officials marching through St. James’s Park in London, accusing the homeless of regulations. “The most despicable thing I've seen was a policeman telling an older homeless gentleman to move on. The man declared inarticulously that he couldn't go anywhere else, "said O & # 39; Neill. When the journalist questioned the officials' stubborn approach, a policeman replied:" I don't make rules. " 
4 The war against the front gardens
In 1604, an English lawyer named Sir Edward Coke said: "Every man's house is his safest refuge." But this right no longer seems to apply in Britain. On April 9, a police officer was filmed in Rotherham who told a man that his children were not allowed to play in the family's front yard. The officer instructs the father Daniel Connell to return to his home. When the 23-year-old informed the policeman that he wanted to go shopping, the official replied: "You have been to the shop once. I saw you with two cans of pop."  There is no such garden ban in Great Britain. The South Yorkshire police had to apologize after the incident made national headlines.
Rafael Todes, one of the most famous British musicians, received similar advice. The violinist organized a series of outdoor concerts for the residents of his street. The string quartet with Rafael's wife and two children played on the family's doorstep. The music was developed to raise the mood of the community during the ban. The event was also streamed around the world to raise money for St. Johns Hospice in London. But two, admittedly apologetic, police officers from the metropolitan area closed the event.  Neighbors had gathered in front of their houses, allegedly in violation of the block.
The Death family played Dmitri Shostakovich's String Quartet No. 4. Shostakovich lived through Joseph Stalin's reign of terror, in which the authorities arrested many contemporaries and family members of the composer. "The irony is that Shostakovich wrote this piece and packed his suitcase because he was afraid of being arrested by Stalin," said Todes. 
3 Banning Park Benches
Many benches across Britain are now wrapped in tons of red and white tape, and officials are patrolling seating areas. The National Police Chiefs & # 39; Council has even issued official guidelines on when exactly the public can rest on benches. "A short walk to a park bench if the person stays seated much longer"  is a possible scenario that violates the police guidelines.
Police officers in Glasgow, Scotland, recently have a disabled woman and instructed her autistic son to leave Glasgow Park. The two rested on a park bench after their daily walk. Ms. Kiki Flood has a number of metal plates in her body after a traumatic accident. She also has an inner ear disorder that affects her balance. The police told Ms. Flood, who walks with a stick, that her disability was not an excuse.  During a separate incident in the same park, officials of a resident with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, a connective tissue disorder, said that it was The bank should not be used. When the woman clutched her shopping bags, she suffered extreme joint pain on her way home.
On April 5, a somewhat more belligerent member of the public was reprimanded for sitting next to the River Thames in London. When confronted, the cheeky woman insisted that she train her thoughts while watching the sunset. The officers arrested the woman and took her home in a police car. Then they "arrested" the kovid crook and gave her a firm sentence. 
2 Chasing a Plague Doctor
A teenager from Norwich, England, was seen walking around in a plague doctor's outfit recently. The footage of the boy from the rural village of Hellesdon quickly caught the attention of the police. At temperatures of 68 degrees Fahrenheit, the boy rolled around his village in a long black coat and a plague doctor mask. The mask was originally worn by quacks during the 14th century bubonic plague. At that time, many believed that the plague was spread by bad smells. The characteristic beak contained aromatic substances that many practitioners believed would stop the spread of the disease by warding off "bad air."
The Norfolk police hunted the prankster and hunted with caution. "The individual was discussed about the consequences of their actions and the potential impact on some people in the local community," said a police spokesman. However, the police admitted that no crime had actually occurred.
1 "I will invent something"
On a sunny April afternoon, Adam Kidger was on the way to pick up a quad bike in Accrington, England. Lancashire police pulled the 24-year-old over and accused him of violating the blocking rules. One of the officers takes a somewhat aggressive stance: "You want to take a step [up] towards me and blow out your chest – something like that – then I'll lock you up. We'll do it, right?" When the man asks which crime he has committed, the official replies: "I will invent something: public order [offence] and turn to a police officer. Should I do who do you believe, me or you?" The confused man gives the Lancashire police a head and points to the camera to show the officer that he is being filmed. The unsuspecting policeman storms away. His colleagues are silent.
The British press has received recordings of the officer's behavior. The Lancashire police rejected the police officer’s actions and reported to the police behavior watchdog.  While police corruption appears to be the police man's most obvious failure, he also violated the guidelines on social distancing.
Top 10 Striking Images This shows the influence of Covid-19 on the world
We publish lists of our readers! Submit here. . .