قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Lists / The reason why photography is not allowed in the Sistine Chapel

The reason why photography is not allowed in the Sistine Chapel



The Sistine Chapel in the Vatican City is home to some of humankind's greatest art works and a popular tourist destination (to say the least). If you were one of the 4 million visitors to the famous landmark, you have probably come to know an aspect of the room filled with Michelangelo's beautiful biblical frescoes, which is a surprise to first-time visitors. [19659002] No photography or video is allowed in the Sistine Chapel.

Yes, despite the rules that promote the silent contemplation of the fantastic, sensational art that adorns almost every inch of the walls and ceilings of the Sistine Chapel. The chapel becomes its experience with terse shouts like "No photo! No video! "From security people. The prohibition of photography has existed for several decades, and while many assume that the non-photography rule is to prevent the flashing of cameras from affecting art, the real reason goes back to the restoration of the chapel art that has begun Completion lasted nearly 20 years in 1

980.

When the Vatican officials decided to undertake a major restoration of Michelangelo's art in the chapel, the prize for such an undertaking prompted them to seek outside support to fund the project. In the end, the highest bid was the Nippon Television Network Corporation of Japan, whose offer of $ 3 million (which ultimately increased to $ 4.2 million) was not matched by any company in Italy or the United States.

In return for funding the renovation, Nippon TV received exclusive rights to the photography and video of the restored art, as well as photos and records of the restoration process by photographer Takashi Okamura, commissioned by Nippon TV. While many initially made fun of the deal, the high-resolution photos provided by Nippon provided a highly detailed look behind the scaffolding that hid each stage of the restoration, eventually convincing some critics of the agreement. As a result Nippon produced several documentary films, art books and other projects with their exclusive photographs and footage of the restoration of the Sistine Chapel, including several famous collections of photographic surveys that informed the project.

The ban on photography in the chapel remains in force, though Nippon's terms of contract wane. In 1990 the New York Times reported that Nippon's commercial exclusivity for photos had expired three years after the completion of each phase of the restoration. For example, as of 1997, photos of Michelangelo's epic representation of the Last Judgment were no longer subject to Nippon copyright, as this phase of restoration was completed in 1994.

Nippon stated that her photo ban was not applicable For "normal tourists", but for the sake of simplicity – so that no professional photographer disguised in Bermuda, socks and sandals – this was regulated by the authorities on a flat-rate basis.

The "No Photos!" Rule continues for the Sistine Chapel "No Video!" (As some of the youngest visitors can attest, their enforcement is not necessarily severe.) Given the damage caused by thousands of flashlights in the chapel It is not surprising that the Vatican officials decided not to end the ban when Nippon's contract expired.

After all, the chapel is home to some of the world's greatest art – and of course a souvenir shop with souvenir photos. [19659010] (function (d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName (s) [0];
if (d.getElementById (id)) return;
js = d.createElement (s); js.id = id;
js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.7";
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore (js, fjs);
} (document, & # 39; script & # 39 ;, & # 39; facebook-jssdk & # 39;));

Source link