Scientific studies often serve to improve our understanding of the world by providing us with irreplaceable tools to solve our daily problems. Occasionally, however, science goes beyond what is necessary and enters the realm of the ridiculous, just because the scientists had nothing better to do that day.
Always hear that a child asks stupid questions, such as, "What if birds are lying around?" ? "Although most of us would laugh and ignore these questions, some scientists look serious and say," Well, let's find out. "
To know what we are talking about, some of the most weirdest things are necessary scientific studies ever conducted.
0 How do apples and oranges really differ?
We have conveniently used the alleged differences between apples and oranges in disputes at parties since someone has found the parable. ". , I compare apples to oranges. "It also makes sense, because they look and taste very different and serve the argument well. The surgeon James E. Barone, who decided to take a closer look, was obviously not good at that.
As it turns out, according to a detailed work presented at the Connecticut Society of American Board Surgeons, apples and oranges are actually very similar. After conducting experiments – probably hunched over their work tables for hours and looking serious – they came to the conclusion that the only difference between apples and oranges is in their color and type of seeds. Otherwise, they might as well be the same fruit.
Thanks to them we are back and have no idiom to compare two seemingly incoherent things in random conversations. 
9 How are shrimp going on A treadmill?
What do you think when you look at shrimp?
For the gourmets it can be all about their texture and what they could be paired with. For the occasional observer, they may look like another of the myriad marine species that have no significant impact on our lives. For the scientists doing this study, the first question that came to their minds was, "What if we put them on a treadmill?"
Under the guise of examining the effects of stress on life in the treadmill Meer, as they were trying to answer a ridiculous question one of their children decided to answer, a few scientists injected shrimp with bacterial infections and placed them on a tiny underwater treadmill to see what would happen.
or even interest – no matter where, they came to the conclusion that uninfected shrimp did better than their infected one. The best (or worst) part? The study received $ 682,570 in taxpayership from the National Science Foundation. 
8 Is it better to smash an empty or full beer bottle on someone else's head?
Anyone who was ever in a bar would remember the things that were going through his head at the time: "What's going on?" "Am I bleeding?" "How am I coming home? "
These are probably the most common things, though we can say with certainty that the science of what sort of beer bottles one should smash someone's head with was not one of them. However, for the scientists conducting this exact study, it was a question to answer.
They took both full and empty half-liter beer bottles and ran a stress test in a drop tower, telling them that they were really preparing for it. They found that empty beer bottles broke at 40 J energy and full at 30 J.
If that sounds like a significant difference, it really is not. Both are enough to break the human skull, something that bar brawlers have known since the invention of bars (or beer bottles). 
7 How to pee to avoid splashing?
For all men There was always a pee in foreign washrooms a kind of gambling. One of the reasons is the spray mechanics of the pot. You never know how much of it you'll put in your shoes and pants, and we've all really made peace with it.
Is it worthwhile to invest resources and conduct a comprehensive scientific study? No, most men would say – but not these three scientists who believe that it is a problem that needs to be investigated.
In a study conducted at Brigham Young University in the appropriately designated Splash Lab, a urethra was provided with 3-D pressure and all sorts of sophisticated types of experiments were used to determine exactly what the worst Kind of rebound caused. And by "sophisticated" we mean "sophisticated" – with a team of scientists and a fully trained laboratory setup. 
You've noticed that the size of the piss-pots or the speed with what you pee does not matter at all. It's more about the angle, even though most of us would have found out about it in one of our drunken nights without any lab equipment.
6 What is the mathematical formula for perfect cheese on toast?
Toast with cheese seems to be a very uncomplicated affair. They only take the cheese and the toast and. , , Put the cheese on the toast.
Sure, some people want it to be perfect and can make some efforts to incorporate advanced cheese techniques into their breakfast routine. By and large, for example, people do not seem to need a mathematical formula for it.
However, the Royal Society of Chemistry and the British Cheese Board vehemently reject this. In fact, they have a mathematical formula – complete with complex variables and units that have nothing to do with a formula for toasted cheese – to do this perfectly. 
They have adapted the various variables – such as the temperature and texture of the cheese – even under stringent laboratory conditions to address it, though we still claim that this was not necessary at all.
5 How to go without spilling coffee?
Anyone who ever had to get up from his desk and walk somewhere with a cup of coffee in one hand knows the problems involved in making that decision. If you do not have the art of balancing or at least spent a lot of time practicing this, there is a good chance that you will spill some of it.
And for most of us that's a compromise we do The more time the coffee is within your immediate reach, the more coffee you can drink because the coffee is great. But is the problem big enough for a scientific study? We do not believe that.
However, this does not apply to the scientists who have spent much of their time understanding the physics behind the coffee process while walking. Using complex expressions such as "coffee-cup fluid-structure interaction," "resonance region," and "maximum spillage," the study carefully examined how we can optimize our experiences when walking with coffee.
They concluded – completely without irony and probably with straight faces – that one of the best ways to walk with coffee is to go backwards, even if you look stupid when you do it and actually spill things not a big problem. They also suggest claw-like holding the cup to further improve the results. 
4 Take a picture without anyone blinking?
If you are a photographer for family gatherings (not because you are ugly, we swear, you are very good at it), you are familiar with the problem of the one person who is always in the final Picture is flashing, no matter what you do.
It's not always the same person either. It can be anyone, and they probably have not made it conscious (unless a malignant actually puts the eyelashes on the kick for the kicks).
What is not really an issue for most casual photographers, however, is for CSIRO physicist dr. Piers Barnes worth something. He used probability and calculus to find an equation to determine exactly how many photos you would need to take (with a confidence level of 99 percent) to make sure you got one without anyone blinking.
He found that the value was larger The more people you see in the photo, the higher the likelihood that you will blink unintentionally. If the number of people is in the middle range, around 20, you would need to take about six photos if the light is good, and about ten if that is not the case. 
3 How does sitting a cow last for a long time?
We all know that cows are difficult to understand. They are never sure what they want, just because of the facial expressions, because they show no emotion shows in a spectacular way. However, we can not complain because they provide us with food and milk. They also lazy for a long time, depending on how relaxed they feel that day, because, frankly, they are cows, and that's what they do.
For the scientists who conducted this study, which was published in Applied Animal Behavior Science there was obviously some scientific data to gather among all the cows' sitting and standing supervisors, the researchers said set out in search. Data such as "Do cows that sit longer are more likely to stand up?" 
After tens of thousands of cows with specially installed sensors were recorded and examined, the scientists concluded that the longer a cow sits, the more likely it is that she will get up again.
2 How uncomfortable is wet underwear really?
If you have ever been in the rain or jumped into the water without changing your clothes, you know the difficulties you are in – wet underwear. Despite our best efforts to advance underwear technology, little progress has been made in minimizing these inconveniences. It's bad, but then we learn to live with it.
Except these scientists who just did not buy it. Is it really uncomfortable for you?
To get to the bottom of this, they conducted their own study – complete with test subjects and demonstrable scientific research. They took eight men in wet underwear and observed their skin and rectal temperatures and weight loss over a period of 60 minutes. These included details such as trembling and visible discomfort.
In a result that would in no way be considered surprising, they concluded that wet underwear makes you colder and more uncomfortable and the thickness of the material plays a big role in the results. 
1 What's wrong with Navel Fluff?
The navel button serves no apparent purpose except that it is part of the overall appearance of the body, without which we would all look pretty scary. The only time we pay attention to her is the few days when we decide that they need to be cleared. Apart from that, it's just kind of background.
If we ask you about the exact nature of the lint that accumulates there, most of us would be "probably filthy, who cares?" Answers. However, this is not enough for scientists from the Vienna University of Technology, who studied the exact content of umbilical flax for four years.
From 2005 to 2009, Georg Steinhauser collected 503 pieces of his own belly button and carefully examined it to find out what it might be. It can be said that it eventually became an obsession when he started questioning other people about their navel fluff.
Hopefully he added to his readings – or maybe brought some people to them for no reason. He concluded that the lint was actually guided by the nature of the hair in the navel and came mainly from the shirt or T-shirt he wore that day. 
Himanshu may refer strangers on Twitter as Obscenities (19459026) @RudeRidingRomeo or make amateur drawings on Instagram @anartism_. He has written for Screen Rant, Forbes, Cracked, Modern Rogue and Arre. Pay him for writing things here: [email protected]